This may be the driving force of models and adverts.
The person looks at the picture, sees an area of interest, and likes the area of interest and positions themselves being in the same spot and being viewed by another. The realization of a concentration point in an image, allows a person to accept and imagine being in such position in the picture.
A person with similar interests as those of the photographer is likely to see the concentration point more quickly. The photographer above communicates his personal interests in the photo through his concentration point. Looking closely one can notice that some areas in the painting are more vividly painted than the others.īerger says, "and often dialogue is an attempt to verbalize this an attempt to explain how, metaphorically or literally, "you see things" and discover how he sees things'" (John Berger & Corporation, 1976).
A more direct example can be found in an artists' painting. The concentration point determines the photographers' interest in the environment he was capturing. An example for this is vivid in a photographers' work, where at some point the camera may seem to concentrate at one point. One starts to question each picture at a certain point of the picture than to the rest image. This enables a person to outline the relation between the things they see and themselves. The relationship between what our eyes come across and the picture already in our mind about that thing defines our vision. Relationship between what we perceive and what we know Intelligence to manipulate the picture and what we see is solely necessary to explain what cannot be said through words but pictures. People have different views based on their upbringing environment and intelligence. This maybe is due to the purpose of advertising and other actions that must be communicated to the whole society. Pictures play a large and decisive role of taking place and a task of effectively explaining what cannot be explained in words. Though we can generate a million views from a single picture, some things cannot be explained fully through words alone. For that purpose, Berger takes the task of questioning our ability to generate accurate and relevant views from a picture. They say a single picture can generate a million views. Second, we start to communicate with the image. John Berger says," The way we see a thing is affected by what we know or what we believe." This is influenced by the assumptions of civilization, class, and gender(John Berger & Corporation, 1976). First, our eyes are exposed to the image, everyone sees the same image. When we look at such images, two things happen. There is a lot that can be communicated through a single painting or picture.īerger argues that by sampling each painting, photographs and graphic art, the image concept our eyes are exposed to be not the only thing that happens. Modern art has taken another step ahead, where even those with less talent of painting can modify their painting through technology. This is due to technological advancement in the modern art. John Berger's Ways of Seeing gives a technical knockout to the way different societies interpret and criticize painting and art. It is a comparison between how people appreciate art in the modern day versus the ancient time. John Berger's "Ways of Seeing" is primarily based on criticism of art and the way the societies interpret what it sees in the artwork.
0 kommentar(er)
